Thank you.
I'm going to start very quickly with Professor Norris, and follow up with Professor Marland and Professor Pammett.
When we talk about voter vouching, Professor Norris, earlier guests and many in testimony lead to...and there's been quite a contentious argument about the fact that a lot of regularities have been, we'll say, presumed fraud. So the presumption of fraud seems to be the case here for the government to do this, because otherwise they would go for an alternate system as opposed to the current system of vouching.
In your experience internationally, and by international I guess I'm talking about the United States because I've heard through many talk shows and through many publications about the term “voter suppression” being caught up in the rhetoric.... But there are a lot of people in the United States who do feel disenfranchised. It seems to happen in a very short period of time, at least in my understanding. You may tell me differently. But was the genesis of that to do with the presumption of fraud in many cases, which led to the elimination of the right to vote, which to me is a basic inalienable right that is enshrined in our charter?