Well, I think the CEO has brought latitude there, because that's going to be the point in running and demonstrating that.
If I may, I'll read something from my own Supreme Court case. I'll get to the second paragraph of the conclusion. The judges said:
At issue in this appeal are the principles to be applied when a federal election is challenged on the basis of “irregularities”.
There was no allegation of fraud, and so forth. It goes on to say:
Given the complexity of administering a federal election, the tens of thousands of election workers involved, many of whom have no on-the-job experience, and the short time frame for hiring and training them, it is inevitable that administrative mistakes will be made. If elections can be easily annulled on the basis of administrative errors, public confidence in the finality and legitimacy of election results will be eroded. Only irregularities—
He goes on to talk about the integrity of the process and the fact that training is an issue.
I don't disagree that early training—