Let me give you a bit of background to that.
“For cause” would include incompetence, conflict of interest, misconduct, misbehaviour, and things of that nature. The bill also proposes or states that the commissioner would conduct his investigations independently. So I won't have the ability to see what he's doing with respect to many investigations. I only get the investigations that he concludes include evidence to show reasonable grounds to believe an offence has been committed. They get referred to me. For a portion of his work, the portion that results in compliance agreements, the portion that results in no conclusion that it should be referred to me, I don't get to oversee that at all; I never see it unless one of our counsels provided advice during the course of the investigation.
So when can I exercise the power to dismiss for cause? It would have to be in relation to a case that had been brought to our attention where, for example, the investigation had not just gone totally off the rails but had been an improper investigation, in our estimation.