Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Following that last exchange there seemed to be some conflict between the testimony of Mr. Christopherson and the testimony of Mr. Saunders. Then I realized that you're the only one here actually giving testimony here today, and so I'm going to review some of my last questions potentially for Mr. Christopherson's benefit.
You said that since 2007 there has been absolutely zero role or interference by the attorney general in the prosecution of election offences. Is that correct?