I have a question more than anything for the government.
What would the harm be? There doesn't seem to be too much disagreement, but it's sort of belt versus suspenders. If this creates less public money being spent in the courts because we can be that much clearer here, it seems that would be an improvement to the bill.
I would ask the government, what is the potential downside of putting in this extra wording to ensure that we don't end up in court and go through a whole thing when every one of us seems to be onside? I would just ask the government if there is some particular reason or some harm done that we are not aware of if we go ahead and put the wording in.