If I may, Chair, isn't that the whole concern and part of Ms. May's...?
I'm not a lawyer so some of you have an advantage on these kinds of things when it comes to the courts and their roles at one time. It was suggested by a learned colleague that this could give rise to a question that ultimately would need to go to the courts. That would be my response, if there's that potential and none of us want that to happen and it's clear what we would hope as the drafters of the legislation would be the outcome of that court case, should there be one, why not pre-empt and preclude anybody from having to go through all of that when we seem to be of one mind and putting in the language would seem to not harm anything else?