My intent was to implore those who voted against this with the same thrust in the last time we debated this issue, to reconsider in this case. It's not done in an irresponsible manner. We've heard from the testimony that the Chief Electoral Officer would certainly like to have more flexibility, and we trust that person to do as such. I think this goes a long way to providing something that's not overly prescriptive but that is certainly allowing him the confidence to do his or her job.
On April 29th, 2014. See this statement in context.