Thank you for your suggestion.
In response, we're satisfied in that we believe this strikes the right balance. It gives a little bit of extra time for the CEO to issue guidelines and interpretations, which we believe is the most important thing, and it doesn't add time on top of that.
One of the considerations of all parties is to try to get rulings and interpretations as quickly as possible, given the fact that the CEO has to consider all aspects of suggestions, recommendations, and input from the parties. I think giving the CEO additional time is necessary, and I think that's a good thing, but without adding an additional 15 days or two weeks on to the end result, which is, I think, problematic for most parties. We thought we could certainly cut the 30-day consultation down to 15. It still should give enough time for parties to give that information and consider the information they wish to pass along.
What I'm saying, Craig, is that we're satisfied with this. I think it's appropriate.