I would just like to point out that there is an error in subsection 161(1). I do not think the English provision is supposed to be replaced with a provision in French.
Tom, have you seen it?
On May 1st, 2014. See this statement in context.
On May 1st, 2014. See this statement in context.
Alexandrine Latendresse NDP Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
I would just like to point out that there is an error in subsection 161(1). I do not think the English provision is supposed to be replaced with a provision in French.
Tom, have you seen it?
See context to find out what was said next.