Yes, in quick response to David's rant, he seems to say, or seems to suggest at least, that we consider Mr. Mayrand an opponent of ours because we're asking for an external auditor.
If that is the case, if that is the logic that he's trying to apply to this, then clearly Mr. Neufeld must be an opponent of Monsieur Mayrand, because Mr. Neufeld did an outside compliance audit. During that time, he noticed a great many discrepancies and problems with the vouching process. This is nothing more than that. The goal is to have a compliance audit done similar to what the Neufeld report was. That's it.
When I jokingly referred to trying to fit David with a tinfoil hat, in this case it has to be expandable, because every time he speaks, his head swells a little bit—