That's one of the mechanism questions. I'm not particularly welded to any one particular position.
My personal preference, which may not encourage you, Mr. Chair, is that all the committee chairs would be elected at the same time. It's just like in Saskatchewan, where you can't run for MLA and member of Parliament at the same time. You pick one or the other. If I lose as the member of Parliament for Saskatoon University as the Conservative candidate and the provincial election is the month following, I can't run as the Conservative equivalent provincially and get elected. That would be my personal preference.
The other way one could do this—but you would lose efficiency—would be that if you elected, based on a system of seniority, one committee chair after another, I think that would be inefficient and very difficult to do. I suspect the members would probably go for the system I'm suggesting. Otherwise we would start off with 50 people running for chair of, let's say, the foreign affairs committee or the international trade committee, which are very popular committees, and then some of the less popular committees at the end would be abandoned.