When the British looked at their system, they noted and divided the reforms into two types. There were reforms for the sake of efficiency, and reforms for the sake of effectiveness.
The reform that I'm suggesting here today is very much a reform for the sake of effectiveness. It doesn't mean that I don't have suggestions to keep it efficient. With the revocation of the chairs, the system that I'm suggesting might take up 30 minutes of House time. I even suggested a mechanism where the vote could be held outside of House time. There'd be only one speaker back and forth on the issue, with possible questions. That wouldn't take up House time. In the unlikely event that a chair was removed by the committee, that would maybe take up 30 minutes of time in a day.
When it comes to electing chairs when a Parliament starts, we typically have a length of time before committees are formed and settled. Again, if you use the system I'm suggesting, that the vote is conducted throughout the day, members come to a room, pick up and mark their ballots, and drop off their ballots. I think members can fit that fairly easily into their schedule, without disadvantaging anything else in the schedule of the House.