Mr. Chair, I notice the government representative wanted to move a motion, and then explain the motion and the purpose behind the motion, but even prior to our hearing the motion and getting that explanation, there is a point of order that has been raised.
It makes me reflect on the time when I was trying to get some questions asked of the Speaker. Through points of order, there is this disruptive force where the NDP is trying to avoid accountability on what I think is a very important issue. We have been charged with trying to get a better understanding and coming up with a report at the end of the day on some very serious matters, matters on which we've had professional civil servants draw up some conclusions.
I've had the opportunity to read through those confidential documents that have been provided to me. I think it behooves all of us to not only read through these documents, because there are very serious allegations that we need to investigate and look into. My concern is that we're witnessing the beginnings of some sort of a filibuster.
I would suggest to you that it is not a point of order, and that Mr. Lukiwski should go ahead and move his motion and then provide some sort of an explanation to it.