Thank you. That's my segue to the second point.
Your suggestion is that it not be tied to expulsion. My first thought was we had to have a list of all the indictable offences here, all kinds of clauses and overarching this and that, to make sure we're not inadvertently doing anything wrong. Expulsion, arguably, is one of the strongest measures the House can take. If you deny someone the right to take their seat, you've pretty much done what you can. That's a high threshold.
Why wouldn't that trigger it if it's based on wording that it's an indictable offence? The trigger then is being expelled. You didn't feel that was the right trigger to go to, yet my first thought, just off the top of my head, upon hearing your thoughts was that this is an easier way to define when we're getting into this level of severity. Could I have your thoughts on that?