I think you'd have to ask somebody from the House of Commons. I have no idea what the feeling is about it.
It's perhaps worth pointing out that they are in a different situation from ours. The membership of the House of Lords is relatively static, and when there's a general election, we don't have any sort of wholesale change in the membership, whereas in the Commons at the start of a new Parliament, if the former Speaker has stepped down, there are obviously a lot of new members. It might be thought that the exhaustive vote would have the advantage of giving those new members an opportunity of sorts to find their way around the place, which wouldn't apply in the House of Lords. So there are perhaps arguments in favour of the exhaustive vote system in a House, the membership of which is reconstituted at each general election, but that doesn't apply in the House of Lords.