Yes. It was quite an interesting election. As I mentioned, just over 90 of the 750 hereditary peers stayed on, so that left well over 600 who had left the House. I guess quite a lot of those were hoping there would be an opportunity to come back, and perhaps none of them at that stage had any idea what the competition would be like. About half of the 81 got one or more first-preference votes, but you should see the chart we had to use as we eliminated candidates one by one to get to a result. It was quite complicated. But the system was at least workable.
Instead it's perhaps worth making a comment about the system arising from that. I guess many of those 81 had, so to speak, friends among the members who had indicated that they would vote for them, but of course with a preferential voting system, that doesn't necessarily mean they will give them their number one vote. A feature of this system is that it is only the first-preference votes that start until a candidate has been eliminated. You could be everybody's second-preference candidate, but you'd then stand no chance because you'd be eliminated at the very first stage. So one feature of this system is that although in some respects it might be thought to favour compromise candidates, it can only elect someone who has a decent amount of genuine support so that they get first-preference votes.