I think you've just put your finger on the main point of contention. There are many people here who believe that the exhaustive vote system is a good way to elect a Speaker, primarily because it starts at the beginning of each new Parliament when undoubtedly there's always a bunch of new members. I think in the last Parliament we had probably the highest level of new members of Parliament that we've seen in many years. Although it takes a number of hours to select and elect a new Speaker, it gives an opportunity for all of those new members to, in a sense, get their feet wet and to learn a little bit more about the parliamentary system. It's collegial. I think one of my colleagues opposite called it almost a bonding moment where everyone has a chance to get to know one another over a period of time. So that's the argument we have in front of us.
It's unfortunate that we don't have a member of the House of Commons from your side of the pond to be able to tell us his experiences. But since we don't, let me just then concentrate on the technical aspect of the alternative vote system. You mentioned, I believe only a few moments ago, that you have had really no problems, no glitches, in the system. Can you confirm that? Has there been any technical difficulty whatsoever in utilizing the alternative vote system since you've incorporated it in the House of Lords?