I keep going back to this whole discussion of retroactivity, and it seems to be the one major issue that we've identified as somewhat problematic in this bill. Again, just for the record, to make sure I've got my head wrapped around this correctly, you don't think, particularly if we amended or changed the language somewhat, as you've just suggested, that there would be an issue with retroactivity in terms of any challenges to the bill itself?
On October 28th, 2014. See this statement in context.