Okay, good. I was concerned, because it made it seem that compliance was voluntary, but I think being able to obtain documents when you need them and in an appropriate manner is a very reasonable recommendation.
I notice in recommendations 1 and 2 you identified “furthering the private interest of relatives or friends”. This seems to be a bit of a change.
I remember some of the other cases of public office holders we've dealt with. In the case of Nigel Wright and Barrick, for example, he was the godfather of Anthony Munk's son and he had been lobbied, but it was found that since it wasn't furthering his own personal financial interest, there was a gap.
Have you clarified then, for MPs, how friends and the private interests of relatives or friends are being identified? How would you define “friend”?