Thank you.
I understand that an internal discussion will have to take place before you are given this power. However, you did say that this power was important for you.
You referred earlier to recommendations 17 and 18 of your report.
Could you confirm whether my impression is correct or could you comment on this? Should recommendation 17 be applied and you do not find reason for an inquiry into the subject of a complaint that was submitted to you, you would have the right to comment publicly. As I understand it, you do not currently have the power to do so.
If recommendation 17 is accepted, would recommendation 18 really be necessary?
In fact, you said earlier that members who file a complaint would not have the right to comment on it before the member who is the subject of the complaint is notified of the situation. However, if you have the power to comment when there is no inquiry, is it really necessary to prevent a member from doing so for a few days after a complaint was submitted to you? I think it might discourage members from making pointless complaints or complaints that are not based on a detailed file.