Okay.
I have only about two minutes left.
The other thing I'm working with here is something that could reasonably be considered to have been given to influence the member. The problem here is that someone might say they can't reasonably believe that Scott Reid would change his actions based on the value of this package of pills that he's not likely to use. But you're saying that not my motive but the motive of those who sent it is the problem.
Some kind of interpretation, essentially going from a subjective description to an objective description of “here is what makes it objectively crossing the line” in terms of the motivation of the person who sent it to me would be very helpful. In the same way, we need a nice clear definition of how much an actual gift is. If it's $500, that might be the wrong number, but it is a number we can all work with. Some kind of an interpretation to that extent would be helpful.