You'll provide reports and so forth, and you'll be consulted by members. Here is a bit of a hypothetical situation, so don't feel that you have to answer. Let's say that something came across your desk and you looked at it and said that upon reflection.... There are always different variances on how constitutional something is. There are debatable discussions and so forth.
There's a huge grey area, no doubt, but when you have a situation where it would appear to be fairly clear in your mind, how would you express something of that nature? Outside of saying, “No, this is bad legislation”, because you want to play that role of neutrality, how would you see yourself addressing something where your inside assessment is pretty strong in terms of how it wouldn't meet the Constitution?