Thanks very much.
I'll home in on one question I have and see if any of my colleagues have other questions. I have many.
Currently I just want to deal with the disclosure aspect of your presentation, where you said that you require members to disclose the nature of their investments rather than their value.
I get why you've gone that route, but does not the value have some impact when determining whether or not there's a reasonable expectation of conflict of interest? If I am a minor shareholder, say I have a thousand dollars' worth of shares in a publicly traded company, perhaps even through a mutual fund, and some other member has a majority of shares in the same company, do you not think the difference in value of those two investments might have some bearing on potential conflict of interest?