Evidence of meeting #107 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was travel.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Jill McKenny  Coordinator, Logistics Services, House of Commons

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

This is how I want to do it, so I'll read it out to you once more.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

If you want to do it that way, give us a motion that is properly worded so we know what we're dealing with and what we're debating.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Hopefully you'll be able to understand this. I'll read it.

Number one is that notwithstanding any motion adopted by committee in relation to the submission of proposed amendments to bills, the members of the committee, as well as members who are not part of a caucus represented on the committee, shall submit to the clerk of the committee all of the proposed amendments to the bill no later than end of day on June 8, 2018, in both official languages, and that these be distributed to members.

Number two is that the clerk of the committee write immediately to each member of Parliament who is not a member of the caucus represented on the committee to inform them of the beginning of consideration of the bill by the committee, and to invite them to prepare and submit any proposed amendments to the bill for the committee's consideration prior to the deadline.

Number three is that the committee commence clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-76 on Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at 11 a.m.

Number four is that if 80 or more suggested amendments are received, the chair may limit debate on each clause to a maximum of five minutes per party, per clause.

Number five is should the committee not complete its clause-by-clause consideration of the bill by 9 p.m. on Tuesday, June 12, 2018, all remaining amendments submitted to the committee shall be deemed moved, the chair shall put the question forthwith and successively without further debate on all remaining clauses and proposed amendments, as well as each and every question necessary to dispose of clause-by-clause consideration of the bill, as well as all questions necessary to report the bill to the House, order that it be reprinted, and order the chair to report the bill to the House as soon as possible.

Number six is that the committee travel across Canada from June 4, 2018 until June 8, 2018, and the clerk be authorized to organize travel with meetings in communities in the following regions, as discussed in committee: 1. Atlantic Canada; 2. Québec; 3. Ontario; 4. Prairies—or I guess Alberta——and, 5. British Columbia.

Then, in brackets, we can put the specific locations that we're going to. I would do that, and then end with that the travel budget for the required travel be approved.

Then we have number seven which is that no substantive motions be passed in committee while the committee is on travel.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Your number six is as worded in the original proposal—

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Number one.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Just let me finish. It's number one in the original proposal with the following changes: in number four, you're changing “Prairies” to “Alberta” and—

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Yes.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

—you're striking everything after British Columbia?

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Yes, but then we're adding that the corresponding travel budget be approved.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Is there any debate on the motion?

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

That would put the committee in a place where it would be deciding to approve a travel budget without knowing the amount of it.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

I can tell you the amount.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Yes. Present it to us.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

It's $150,993.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Would that change depending on the final...? I don't know how that works.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

The clerk will tell you the amount.

5:25 p.m.

The Clerk

The draft budget that was distributed had a total of $146,593.20. After some consultation with Jill, we decided that starting in Vancouver would add a night in Vancouver that wouldn't have been there had we gone from Ottawa to Halifax in the morning. The new total has an additional $4,400 added to it, so $150,993.20 is the draft budget.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

I just thought in looking at it that some of the cities were listed differently from what we ended up deciding on, so I wasn't sure if that changed it considerably or not. Okay.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Is there debate on the motion?

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

There was a new number seven as well, something about the....

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Number seven is what you pointed out earlier, which I think is a very valid point, that no substantive motions be moved while the committee is on travel.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Okay. Thank you for clarifying that.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Thank you.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Is there debate on the motion?

Mr. Richards.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

I believe Mr. Genuis wanted to be on the list next as well. He mentioned that to me.

In relation to the motion—