That makes sense. I hear what Mr. Nater is saying, but there is an argument, through you, Chair, that we have the benefit of Elections Canada thinking this through, and having a chance to get the results of this last election and then come to the committee.
Mr. Nater, I don't see the benefit to Parliament jumping ahead to a level of specificity when their thinking, Elections Canada, and they're our partners in this, that they would like the time to do that.
My first gut reaction is we're jumping ahead with a level of specificity that is not necessary and may not necessarily be helpful.
Mr. Chair, if we could do a version of the Simms protocol, perhaps Mr. Nater could respond, if you're open to that, Chair.