Evidence of meeting #127 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was elections.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Robert Sampson  Legal Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Trevor Knight  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Stephanie Kusie  Calgary Midnapore, CPC
Jean-François Morin  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk
Linda Lapointe  Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, Lib.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Yes.

9:55 a.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

All right. Therefore, the committee would not have been under the impression that it was passing Liberal-45 as a consequence, because that would mean it would have to be withdrawn separately.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Okay.

9:55 a.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Thank you.

Would you mind saying that affirmatively so that's actually there and we're—

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Okay. The intention to withdraw Liberal-45 was provided at the time we were talking about Liberal-30, so it is not consequential.

9:55 a.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Okay. Thank you.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

CPC-149 was withdrawn. Liberal-46 was passed consequential to Liberal-26. PV-15 was defeated consequential to PV-3. CPC-150 was withdrawn.

We have Liberal-47. It's still in play. Can someone introduce Liberal-47?

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

The new paragraphs 495.3(2)(h) and (i) should both begin with “being a third party” in the English version and “le tiers qui” in the French version, just as the corresponding offences in proposed paragraphs 495.3(1)(f) and (g) are limited to third parties. It's just a technical correction.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Are there any questions?

9:55 a.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

This was just a drafting oversight that was raised by the drafters when we drafted the amendments to the bill. It should have been included from the get-go.

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clause 336 as amended agreed to on division)

(On clause 337)

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Clause 337 has eight amendments. Liberal-48 is passed consequential to Liberal-32.

We have Liberal-49.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I'll have to withdraw Liberal-49.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

You're not presenting Liberal-49?

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I will withdraw LIB-49.

9:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Liberal-50 is consequential to Liberal-26, so that means it's included. That amendment was adopted.

CPC-151 is withdrawn. PV-16 was lost consequentially to PV-3. CPC-152 is withdrawn.

Liberal-51 has passed consequentially to LIB-32.

10 a.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Mr. Chair, may I ask a question?

10 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Yes, Monsieur Morin.

10 a.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Did you say that Liberal-49 has carried?

10 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

No, Liberal-49 was not presented.

10 a.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Okay, thank you. It was consequential to another amendment that was withdrawn, so I wanted to make sure.

(Clause 337 as amended agreed to on division)

10 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Clause 338 had two amendments from the Conservatives: CPC-153 and CPC-154. Both were withdrawn.

(Clause 338 agreed to on division)

On clause 339, Liberal-52 is consequential to Liberal-36, so that amendment passes.

(Clause 339 as amended agreed to on division)

(On clause 340)

Clause 340 has six amendments. The first, which I think is still open for discussion, is CPC-155.

Stephanie.

10 a.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

This essentially defers the implementation of the pre-election spending limits for political parties until after the 2019 election.

10 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Ruby.

10 a.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

It deletes any offences related to pre-election spending limits, and we are not in favour of that.

10 a.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

It nullifies the next two as well.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])