Let's go back to the Constitution because that's what's at issue here.
I'm also on the Subcommittee on Private Members' Business, where I have already spoken about my wife. She came to Canada in 2005 and spoke five languages, but not French. Just before she obtained her citizenship, she moved to Quebec to be with me. If this bill had been passed, she would not have been able to. She would have had to stay in Ontario because she didn't speak a word of French. She is learning it, but it isn't easy as a sixth language. The purpose of the bill is unconstitutional, because no request made to the government is more important than that of citizenship.
Section 20(1)(a) of the Canadian Charter of RIghts and Freedoms states:
there is a significant demand for communications with and services from that office in such language
A citizenship request is a significant demand. You can't say that it isn't significant enough to be in the Constitution. That's my position, and we'll agree to disagree.