Ms. Kusie.
Evidence of meeting #153 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was meeting.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #153 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was meeting.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB
I feel as though, Chair, this has the same theme as my previous suggested motion.
Mr. Bittle, are you sure? This really will be the WWF of PROC. We're getting into the creamed corn here. This is bad. I'd like to offer the government one more opportunity. Let's put the motion as it is. We'll do a recorded vote. If it reveals nothing else, there's no harm, no foul, and we move on. I suggest that to the government, just make sure.
Thank you, Chair.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
Is there any further discussion before we vote?
The committee will suspend for a couple of minutes.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
We will have a recorded vote.
(Subamendment negatived: nays 5; yeas 4)
We're now on the amendment.
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
I was jotting down my own notes for the subamendment. I didn't get the amendment.
Could either Chris or the clerk read it?
Liberal
Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON
At the end of line two, it's “and the Conservative Party of Canada”. Then it ends, “and his decision to issue a compliance agreement to SNC-Lavalin and Pierre Poilievre.”
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
Would you be able to say "compliance agreements", plural?
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
Forgive me, but I have one other question to ask. You're aware that the Pierre Poilievre compliance agreement is not with relation to SNC-Lavalin. That's on a separate matter.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
We'll have a recorded vote on the amendment.
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 9; nays 0)
Now we'll have the vote on the motion as amended.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
We'll have a recorded vote.
Just for the wording, Mr. Reid, would it be a friendly amendment that the committee “invite” the Commissioner of Canada Elections to appear?
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
Yes. If everybody else is agreeable to it, I certainly am.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
We have a recorded vote on the motion as amended.
(Motion as amended negatived: nays 5; yeas 4)
Carrying on committee business, I'll go to Mr. Caron, but I'm wondering if I could get the permission of the committee to use Thursday's meeting to give instructions to the researcher on our parallel chamber report.
Mr. Reid.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
Is anyone opposed?
That's great. We'll do that on Thursday.
Mr. Caron.
Guy Caron NDP Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC
I'd like to say that I am quite pleased to set aside the motion Mr. Christopherson wanted to present and to let him introduce it at some subsequent date. I will not introduce it this morning.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell
Okay. We're not discussing that motion today.
On that list I handed out, is there anything we haven't dealt with yet?
Conservative
Liberal