I noticed in some of the other examples that we had before us of previous cases like this, the premature disclosure of the contents of the bill, there seemed to be some differing opinions on whether the contents of the bill had been released. Sometimes it can be difficult to determine whether someone just had a lucky guess or whether contents of the bill were released.
In the absence of being able to determine that, is there any advice on how the committee would proceed? Obviously it would be important for the committee to try to make sure it's taken as a cautionary tale for any future government bills.