Now as we know that, and we're looking at the wording, and Ruby pointed out some other cases, but again the wording that she mentioned was having those key words.... I'm guessing in looking back, if there was an issue it should have been raised. I don't know why, I can't speak to that because I wasn't here, but clearly there must have been something that those in the opposition at the time felt was not a breach. But as I said here, the language in this article as we all read it clearly shows this is a statement of fact, rather than reporters' speculation. I think it goes beyond that.
I know you mentioned, and other people have mentioned, that where we go from here is basically up to the committee, that we can do as we so choose. We can move in the direction we want. I appreciate that.
Looking a couple of steps forward, what would be your advice on how we prevent this kind of thing happening in the future? Can you give us a couple of points where you think it might work?