I do understand that they have the same date; however, I would argue that the substance of the motions would still be important to consider. Obviously, there is an opportunity for those to be amended as well.
I would think that it would be possible for us to still carry them and just seek an amendment to them, because the substance is still important and very germane to the subject matter that we're studying on this important matter of privilege.
I would hope that they could still be moved. Obviously, there would be an amendment required.