I'm about to conclude.
That isn't to put it on anyone sitting across the table from me right now. I'm not accusing any of you of having a hidden motive or agenda, but I think somewhere maybe there is. Maybe it is what I think it is, that they want to see a question period removed. It could be that. Maybe it's something else that I don't know, but that would seem the most logical one.
By no means is that the only issue here. I think there are some things in the discussion paper that are worth having a conversation about. There are some other things that I do have challenges with. The conversation would be good to have, but it has to be had in a way where we can expect that both parties will listen to the other. I don't really get a sense that the government has any motivation, or there's nothing that causes them to have to listen. I've seen some signs that would indicate that maybe that won't happen. For us to feel comfortable, we need to have that assurance.