The motion is to have a conversation to expand on an existing study. The letter from the minister provides input to that study. I think that's an important point, because the motion doesn't refer to the letter.
Nowhere does the motion change any Standing Orders: it's to discuss options. As I've said many times before, if we're going to have a filibuster, the appropriate time to do it.... I have no problem with filibusters, and no proposal would prevent them. It may change their structure somewhat, but it would never stop them from happening. The appropriate time to do it is at report stage. Really, David—