I wanted to add and support what Jenny is saying. It also is offensive to the principles of Westminster parliamentary democracy, because the concept of responsible government is that every member of Parliament in the House is there to hold the government to account, whether they're backbench members of the government party or not. This goes back to some of our deeper traditions.
That's one of the reasons that it's even more offensive that we have these lobbed questions, because whether in the 41st Parliament when it was backbench Conservatives or in this Parliament when it's backbench Liberals, the job—which of course people have forgotten over time—of every member of Parliament is to hold the government accountable.
It was such a strong rule that in the past if backbench members of the government party were promoted to cabinet, their job had changed so fundamentally that they were expected to stand down and run again in a by-election. This isn't about crossing the floor; this is about going from Liberal backbencher to Liberal cabinet minister, because the job was seen, until that ascension to power, to be representing constituents on holding the government to account, so it's doubly offensive.
I'm sorry for interrupting you, Jenny.