Oh.
Just very briefly, I want to finish my thought on this. A functioning legislature, a functioning house of Parliament, needs an opposition. It is one of the four functions that I referenced at the beginning. Not having an opposition is sure going to be exceptionally efficient, but it also moves the discussion out of the public. When you have a large majority or an ultimate majority, in that case, the debate no longer happens in the House or in the legislature, but it happens in the caucus meetings. It happens behind closed doors, and so you're really taking the visible element of debate and putting it inside.
We have seen that in other circumstances, Alberta, for example, with large majorities. There actually have been public comments from different people who have said—tongue in cheek, I hope—that maybe those types of government should just do all of their work in caucus and avoid the publicity. I'm hoping that was somewhat tongue in cheek, but that impression can happen. If you don't have an opposition, you can pass legislation at the drop of a dime, rather than having the opposition. I mean at the drop of a hat—I keep mixing my metaphors.
There was a comment. I'm happy to....