Yes, Parliament is supreme. I don't believe the discussion paper is stating anywhere, from my reading of it, that the Liberals know what's best. It doesn't matter what side of the aisle they come from if they're good ideas, but we can't even have a discussion at this point to figure out whether some of those ideas are good or not. I'm not even going to say whether some of them are good ideas or not, because that's a discussion we have to all engage in.
Of course I have some preference toward some of them, and some of them I may not. I think as a committee, a lot of times colleagues bring up some really valid points and sometimes they can shape the way we think or feel about it, but that only happens once we engage in that substantive discussion and once we have witnesses to give us the facts and give us some studies. I don't want to just be going off of my emotions. My emotions may lead me one way. I want to hear from witnesses. I want to hear from experts. I want to hear from them what works and what doesn't work. It doesn't really matter where my emotions lie, because as parliamentarians, we have to look at that, consider where the evidence is, and then consider how we feel. We have to weigh the two. It can't just be all about our emotional plea and what we want.