I was going to suggest that this would be reasonable. It might be a good way of approaching that.
It's clear that there is such a thing as a bill that from one angle looks like an omnibus, which all of us, I think, take to mean a bill that has too much in it to be characterized by a single narrative. On the other hand, sometimes we have a single but very complicated narrative.
I'm reading Remembrance of Things Past , which is a 3,000-page novel that includes many different themes all linked together. That is not true with Flannery O'Connor's short stories that my colleague Mr. Genuis is reading, each of which has a very clear, narrow theme.
It can be legitimate in certain cases, so perhaps the way to sort it out is to look back at what has happened in the past.