There have been a couple times that you've mentioned this. I'm speaking next and I was going to address it then, but I thought I'd do this first because I don't know if I'll get a chance afterwards to answer.
The member has talked about “on division”. We have a vote and it is accepted, but members will yell “On division” and therefore it's recognized that not everybody in the room agrees with what is being passed.
Then there is also the idea of accountability. I don't know what he's suggesting and I'm not saying he's wrong, but is he suggesting that more votes should go that way? If you want to be accountable....
I know that on some of the most important stuff you'd want to have a registered, recorded vote—I get that part—but important to whom? We have large constituencies, and I can think of some instances where it may not be important to them.
I see Mr. Sopuck in the room. It was you, sir, who had the heritage bill. Is that correct?