Evidence of meeting #74 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was event.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Olivier Champagne  Legislative Clerk, House of Commons
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Madeleine Dupuis  Policy Advisor, Democratic Institutions, Privy Council Office

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Go ahead, Mr. Christopherson.

12:10 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

The consequences of not adopting this amendment would be what?

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Andy Fillmore Liberal Halifax, NS

I'll defer to the officials on that.

12:10 p.m.

Policy Advisor, Democratic Institutions, Privy Council Office

Madeleine Dupuis

Right now, organizers have the obligation to tell political parties the information they need to file their reports, but if the organizers become aware of a change in that information, they're not obligated to tell the party, and the party, not knowing, can't update the report. This would put the obligation on the organizers to update any reporting information if they're aware of it.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Is there any further debate?

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

LIB-5 and LIB-8 are carried.

PV-2 cannot be moved because LIB-3 was adopted. Those are all the amendments on clause 2. Can we vote on clause 2, as amended?

12:10 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

On division.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

On division.

(Clause 2 as amended agreed to on division)

I notice there are no amendments on clauses 3 to 8. I'm going to ask the legislative assistant if I can do one motion to deal with all of them.

(Clauses 3 to 8 inclusive agreed to on division)

(On clause 9)

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

All the amendments for clause 9 were all consequential, so we don't have to deal with NDP-8, LIB-6, NDP-9, LIB-7, and LIB-8.

Shall clause 9, as amended, carry?

(Clause 9 agreed to as amended on division)

(Clause 10 agreed to on division)

(On clause 11)

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We're on PV-3. PV is not here, but it's deemed moved.

If anyone understands this amendment, do they want to present it?

Go ahead, David.

12:10 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

It ties to NDP-10, and it deals with the fine. I had gone notionally with a fine from $1,000 to $5,000. I was under the impression—

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

I forgot to say that if this passes, David, NDP-10 cannot be moved because of a line conflict.

12:10 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Yes, it's an either-or situation.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Elizabeth, we're on PV-3.

12:10 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

I know. I heard that. I didn't think you'd get to clause 11 so quickly.

Thank you for giving me a chance to speak to it. It's very straightforward. Again, and particularly I suppose, I looked to the testimony of Jean-Pierre Kingsley, who thought that a $1,000 penalty was not going to have much of an impact. With the help of drafters, I put before you his suggestion that the penalty be related to the offence and be basically a doubling of whatever money was received that violated the scheme of this particular fundraising code.

It's a very straightforward amendment. Anybody who holds a fundraiser and collects funds that are in excess will find themselves paying basically double what they received.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

I have Mr. Christopherson and then Mr. Reid.

12:10 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Thanks, Chair.

As you can see in NDP-10, which follows PV-3, I'm not married to an exact number or formula of penalty, but I am in agreement. A number of witnesses said that the $1,000 fine is really a bit low. In some cases, that really could just become the cost of doing business, and then people could just ignore the rules all they want.

I'm open to either. I just hope that we agree collectively that $1,000 is not enough. Then the question is, where is the comfort level for a majority of us?

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. Reid is next, and then Mr. Graham.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Are we once again in a situation where the passage of one amendment would preclude the other from being debated?

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Yes, NDP-10 could not be debated.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

NDP-10 could not be debated.

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Do you know what it is?

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

I'd like to hear Mr. Christopherson explain what it is.

12:15 p.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

It raises the penalty from $1,000 to $5,000. Elizabeth's amendment would use the Kingsley formula of double the amount that was raised. Those are the two.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Thank you.

May I ask the witnesses whether using the term “double the amount” means—

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

That was raised.