Thank you.
I would agree with you. I don't want perfect to become the enemy of the good either in this case. I do think it's really important.
I guess one of the challenges with the legislative option is having enough time to get it through the whole process. That said, there may be an element, such as a small legislative tweak, that may be made with a bit more flexibility in what the commission or commissioner would look like.
From a nascent point of view, I would be thinking about establishing some kind of grants and contributions policy that would lay out the criteria for a commission or a commissioner to establish some of the basic requirements for participation in a debate and who we would encourage to engage with in broadcasting. One of the models that I think is interesting, whether it's CPAC or not, is having a broadcaster tasked with hosting the debate and then providing transmission to any interested stakeholder or party, whether that's a broadcaster, social media, political party, citizens' interest group, or whatever it may be, but providing that transmission so it can be shown wherever.