Certainly.
One of the interesting things about leaders' debates is the history of them. They really came from the first debate—was it 1960?—that was held during the American elections with John F. Kennedy. That was the first time that a leaders' debate had been publicized and broadcast on TV. Then Canada, like other countries around the world, took up this model and started to portray it.
What the U.S. has ensured is that during all of their leaders' debates, they have sign language translation that is broadcast alongside. While there were some instances in the 2015 election of closed captioning or sign language, it wasn't consistent among all of the debates. I think the accessibility requirements and criteria are something to consider when imagining what a commission or commissioner would look like for leaders' debates.
I think all of us can agree that the more people have access and are able to understand with dignity and participate with dignity in the process, the better it is for the democratic process in general. I would definitely encourage the committee to think broadly about what accessibility means in this context.