I think that's an excellent question.
One of the things I have been considering is whether we want to set something up informally in the interim to kind of test to see how it works before moving into a legislated option that might lock something in.
That said, one of the pieces I'm interested to hear about from the committee and witnesses is this. It has generally been considered very difficult to compel or force a party leader to participate in a debate through legislation. However, we could consider setting up an NGO or an arm's-length entity that would not be required through legislation and could be done through a G and C process. We could establish that first experience to see how it goes. Then, following the election, we could decide whether we're going to implement that in law.
However, I completely take your point that if it's not in statute or law, you run the risk of it not becoming something permanent. That's where I'm looking at the—