I want to build on some of the comments from both Mr. Reid and Mr. Christopherson regarding participation.
Mr. Christopherson mentioned the participation of the Chief Electoral Officer. I want to put a thought out to all of us to think about; it might be a Pandora's box, but that's what we do here.
If the CEO is involved, I think the baseline becomes: we have 15 registered parties; they all get equal play all the time, and the whole idea of thresholds is out the window, because the CEO has to be a neutral arbiter. As soon as the CEO says only parties with members can participate, then he is no longer a neutral arbiter from the perspective of elections management. That's a concern that I'm wondering if you agree or disagree with, or how you feel about it.