Thank you very much.
I have another question in the same vein.
Mr. Maingot, you told us that Internet service is not considered an obstruction that would keep a member from attending, because it's something outside Parliament's control, like a missed flight or a storm. I want to examine that question from the other direction.
If the House increases in-person sittings, by prolonging the sitting day and increasing the number of members, could that be considered as obstructing certain members from attending, if they are afraid of going to Parliament for health reasons because they are older, ill or immunosuppressed or have children?
Would that be considered obstruction, because the decision to extend the periods of physical attendance would have been made by the House?