If I may, I know exactly what Mr. Turnbull is referring to. It appears later because that's the interpretation of quorum, as opposed to just the rule of quorum itself, which is very straightforward. It was more how quorum would be looked at by the courts, and this was Mr. Dufresne's interpretation, whereas this section is just meant to say what quorum is.
However, I'm more than happy to add it there, if that's what the committee would like.