To clarify, what I was referring to is the motion that we're debating now, I guess, that was made on the floor by Mr. Turnbull. Then he, of course, made a suggestion to amend his own motion, and the amendment is to allow something to be done by a majority vote, rather than by all parties being in agreement on [Technical difficulty—Editor] measure. That is what I was referring to as being incredibly dangerous.
I still disagree with his main motion, but although my objections are there, the main motion is not one that I would go to any length to protect democracy from. If that's the will of the committee and I just happen to be in opposition to the majority of the committee, that's where dissenting reports are an option.
On something fundamental that could actually lead to the very erosion of our democracy, like what Mr. Turnbull has suggested now with this amendment, I will go to any lengths to prevent that from happening.