I'm not capable of that, but I'll try to make it 60 seconds. How's that?
Madam Chair, Eric will correct me if I'm wrong on this, but my understanding is that in the British House of Commons, for instance, they do in-person voting, but they have an in-person voting system that doesn't require every member to be in the chamber at the same time. They have a process of in-person voting that involves a rotation through the lobbies, or something like that. We could very much envision a voting system that addresses some of the very real security concerns that have been raised involving in-person voting while still respecting public health guidelines. That would go in a bit of a different direction from this recommendation.
In particular, in Canada, our institutions are more vulnerable to staff members voting and proxy voting, and I think that would be a bad thing in terms of the independence we expect from members. I think we have to be sensitive to that if we're concerned about the rights and privileges of members, so I would put that out there.