It's correct, yes.
It takes out the reference to “20 members” and takes out the reference to “a permanent change”. Part of what I could see people reacting to—and I can understand why they would be concerned about that—is thinking this was now changing the way the House of Commons would operate in regular times or circumstances, and that was not the intention. It was really focused on those times of exceptional circumstances.
I think it's fairly consistent with how we've been operating to date. It's probably taking one step further in terms of having a virtual presence count as quorum. I think we need that in order to have formal proceedings.