Sure. I can think of a whole host of ways to solve that problem. Being a solutions-oriented person, I'm asking, how we could use more data in terms of those decision-making processes and have those required as part of the decisions that were made.
In terms of the wording I suggested, I was repurposing and trying to come to a collaborative solution, based on wording from the various parties.
The issue you raise is a good one. Maybe there should be a majority vote instead of agreement of all recognized parties. That might help, or in lieu of that, maybe looking at how the definition of an extraordinary or exceptional circumstance could also include clauses or criteria for how those standing orders could be rescinded, or how the opposite of triggering, going back to normal House proceedings, could integrate scientific evidence.