Mr. Richards, the chair is correct. Those tend to be the types of considerations that come into play. For example, during a clause-by-clause meeting when the committee is considering various amendments, occasionally when an amendment gets adopted, it has the effect or the impact of knocking out other ones.
There's a lot more latitude when it comes to a draft report. It's really up to the committee to determine what the recommendations are. Procedurally, if the committee wanted to adopt multiple similar types of recommendations for the report, it could do that. There might be issues of consistency or inconsistency because of that, but procedurally speaking, there wouldn't be anything stopping it. It wouldn't be, as the chair indicated, the same situation in which, if the committee were considering amendments in clause-by-clause to a bill, there would be an automatic impact if some amendments were adopted and others would need to be dropped.
Essentially, it would be in the committee's hands to determine if any other recommendations needed to be adopted, even if there were some, or quite a lot, of overlap in them.